Trump’s Reality Distortion: The Kremlin’s Secret Strategy Comes to Washington

How Vladislav Surkov, Putin’s Master of Non-Linear Warfare, Inspired Trump's Assault on American Democracy

The topic of this article was suggested by Premedica. Please let us know if you have an idea for an investigative piece.

In early 2014, as unmarked troops fanned out across Crimea, a peculiar short story titled Without Sky quietly circulated in Moscow’s political circles. It described the “first non-linear war,” a chaotic conflict in which shifting coalitions fought “all against all,” with allegiances and even objectives constantly in flux (Peter Pomerantsev | Non-Linear War). The presumed author was Vladislav Surkov – the Kremlin’s shadowy strategist and propagandist – and his tale was more parable than fiction. Surkov had spent years engineering a new kind of politics in Russia: a theater of managed chaos, where reality could be twisted, alliances blurred, and the public’s perception endlessly manipulated. This investigative exposé delves into Surkov’s concept of non-linear warfare and its implementation under President Vladimir Putin – from the annexation of Crimea and war in Ukraine to the cynical choreography of Russian domestic politics. It then traces an unsettling parallel to the United States, where since 2025 President Donald Trump’s second-term tactics bear an eerie resemblance – flooding the public sphere with contradictory narratives, industrial-scale gaslighting, and an assault on the very notion of objective truth. Expert voices and credible documents reveal a transcontinental strategy of confuse-and-control – and the profound societal consequences of living in a post-truth era.

Surkov’s “Non-Linear Warfare”: Confusion as Strategy

Vladislav Surkov has been called “Putin’s Rasputin,” “grey cardinal,” and even the architect of Russia’s postmodern dictatorship (IBTimes UK). A former theater director turned political operative, Surkov rose to become Putin’s chief ideologist and political technologist, masterminding what he famously dubbed “sovereign democracy.” At its heart was a doctrine of non-linear warfare – a form of political and psychological combat not constrained by simple binaries or truth. In Surkov’s vision, power is maintained not by persuading everyone of a single lie, but by inundating them with so many conflicting stories that nothing seems real.

(Peter Pomerantsev | Non-Linear War) Surkov’s Without Sky story offers a blueprint of this worldview. “It was the first non-linear war,” the narrator proclaims – unlike the old wars of two sides, now multiple forces and interests collide, “not two against two, or three against one… No. All against all.” In this fictional war, provinces, towns, even social groups switch sides mid-battle, and each faction fights for radically different aims. It is a world where truth is subjective and constantly in motion – exactly the kind of world that a clever puppet-master like Surkov can exploit. Analysts note that Surkov’s strategy is to keep adversaries disoriented. “Russia’s new ‘post-factual politics’,” as one profile described his system, allowed the Kremlin to “experiment with old and new political models” in what writer Eduard Limonov called a “wonderful postmodernist theatre” of power (IBTimes UK). In practice, this meant cultivating confusion – propagating conspiracy theories, funding multiple opposing factions, and staging political drama – all to ensure the public never quite knows what to believe or who really pulls the strings.

At the core of Surkov’s theory were several key principles:

• Multiplicity of Narratives: Rather than a single official line, Surkov’s approach was to unleash numerous, often contradictory narratives. By “directing…propaganda principally through control of state-run television”, he could broadcast one version of events one day and a different version the next. The result was an information fog. For example, when Russian forces covertly seized Crimea in 2014, Russian media and officials floated various explanations – that the armed men were local “self-defense” units, or perhaps mercenaries – only for Putin to later admit they were Russian soldiers once the annexation was a fait accompli. The intended effect was to delay and dilute the world’s response through denial and misdirection, a textbook Surkovian move.

• Political Theater and Contradiction: Surkov turned Russian politics into stagecraft. He would “fund civil rights organisations and NGOs” on one hand, while covertly backing the nationalist groups that attacked those same NGOs (IBTimes UK). He sponsored avant-garde art festivals in Moscow – and simultaneously funded the Orthodox fundamentalist protesters picketing outside. The Kremlin, under Surkov’s guidance, played both arsonist and firefighter, creating problems and then grandiosely “solving” them. “Surkov has…turned Russia into a postmodernist theatre,” Limonov observed, *“where he experiments with old and new political models”. By orchestrating controlled conflicts – liberals versus ultranationalists, secular art lovers versus pious radicals – Surkov could present Putin as the arbiter above the fray, the only source of stability in a contrived sea of chaos.

• Cynicism and Psychological Manipulation: Perhaps Surkov’s greatest insight was that a jaded, cynical public is easier to control. Having lived through Soviet lies and the upheavals of the 1990s, many Russians had come to doubt the existence of any honest politics. Surkov weaponized that cynicism. Inside Russia, nothing was sacred and everything was suspect – a mindset he fostered to make people shrug off the Kremlin’s abuses as just more of the same. “The cynicism that Russians justifiably feel… can easily be spun into a conspiracy-driven vision of everything that happens in the world,” wrote journalist Peter Pomerantsev, describing how Surkov’s team pitched the Ukraine crisis to the public (Peter Pomerantsev | Non-Linear War). State media incessantly suggested “shadowy forces” were behind Ukraine’s 2014 revolution, feeding a paranoid narrative that Western intelligence or secret oligarch cabals orchestrate protests and politics. By seeding wild conspiracy theories, Surkov tapped into deep societal distrust, making people believe nothing is true – except perhaps what the Kremlin tells them.

The Kremlin’s Theater in Action: From Crimea to the Opposition

Surkov’s partnership with Vladimir Putin was a perfect symbiosis: the master manipulator and the strongman he served. Together, they implemented non-linear warfare both abroad and at home with devastating effectiveness. Nowhere was this more evident than in the tumultuous events of 2014 and after, when Russia upended the post-Cold War order – and Surkov’s fingerprints were all over the Kremlin’s playbook.

Vladislav Surkov (left) confers with Russian President Vladimir Putin. As Putin’s chief ideologue, Surkov operated behind the scenes to script the political narrative – from Ukraine’s battlefields to the Kremlin’s corridors.

Sources close to the administration say that Surkov’s role in the annexation of Crimea was pivotal. Officially a presidential advisor at the time, he helped craft the misinformation campaign that accompanied the little green men on the ground. Moscow adamantly insisted it had “no intention of annexing” Ukrainian territory even as a referendum – widely criticized as illegitimate – was hurriedly staged under military occupation. Behind the scenes,